“Weapons of Mass Destruction”? Seriously?

As Joe Huffman mentions here and here, a new buzz-phrase being used by the anti-gun crowd is “weapons of mass destruction,” which they use to describe firearm magazines that hold more cartridges than the anti-gun folks think should be allowed. My initial mocking of this idiocy was to refer to Title 50 USC, Chapter 40, Section 2302, which provides a statutory definition of weapons of mass destruction.

However, I’ve decided on a better way to mock this stupidity:

“You mean the United States invaded Iraq because we had reason to believe that they had 30-round magazines for their weapons?”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Liberty, PSH. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s